Basic checkmates

Checkmate in 3 moves: is it possible?

Updated · Sergei Tovmasian

Short answer

Yes, and three moves is the record for White. One line is 1.e4 f6 2.d4 g5 3.Qh5 mate. It is not forced at any point: Black has to push two kingside pawns and hand over the h5 to e8 diagonal. In puzzles, mate in 3 means three of your own moves that work against every defence, which is far harder.

It is possible, and three moves is as fast as White can ever manage. One version runs 1.e4 f6 2.d4 g5 3.Qh5 mate.

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h 1
1.e4 f6 2.d4 g5 3.Qh5 is mate. Black's f- and g-pawns open the diagonal and then remove the square that could block it.

Here is the finish, so you can see exactly which squares matter.

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h 1
The queen on h5 checks along h5, g6, f7, e8. Both squares in between are empty and f7 is covered by the queen herself.

Why each move is needed

1…f6 is the move that opens the road. Without it the pawn on f7 blocks the diagonal and nothing is possible.

2.d4 looks like a spare move, and in a sense it is. White has no way to punish 1…f6 immediately: 2.Qh5+ is met by 2…g6, the pawn blocks the check, and the queen has to run. So White plays a useful developing move and waits.

2…g5 is the second gift. Now the g6 square can never be filled by that pawn, because the pawn has walked past it. The picture is the same one that produces the two-move mate with colours reversed: an open diagonal to the king plus no blocker.

3.Qh5 arrives and Black is lost. Check the king’s options in the diagram: f7 is attacked by the queen, e7 and d7 hold his own pawns, d8 his queen, f8 his bishop. The knight on g8 can reach f6 and h6 but neither square is on the diagonal, so there is no interposition, and nothing on the board attacks h5.

Nothing here is forced

That word matters. Black chooses 1…f6, and Black chooses 2…g5. Play 2…e6 or 2…Nf6 or almost anything else and there is no mate, only a white queen that will need a second move soon.

So the answer to “can you checkmate in three moves” is yes in the same way that you can win a race if the other runner sits down. I have had it happen to me once, in a five-minute game, against an opponent who was clearly playing with one hand and eating with the other.

Mate in 3 in a puzzle

A puzzle that says mate in 3 is asking for something much stronger: three of your moves that force mate against every reply. That is six half-moves of calculation, and the branching is where the difficulty lives. Your first move usually removes a defender or shuts a flight square, your second forces the king to a particular square, and only the third gives the mate.

The practical method is to picture the final position first and work back to it. Then check the defences you have not looked at, which is always the move you have unconsciously decided is impossible. Sets of three-move mates are the right difficulty once one- and two-movers stop taking you any time at all, and if you want the fastest mates in general, the record for both colours is a short read.

More questions

What is the three-move checkmate?

The usual example is 1.e4 f6 2.d4 g5 3.Qh5 mate. Black's two pawn moves open the h5 to e8 diagonal and remove the g6 square that would otherwise block the check. The move order 1.e4 g5 2.d4 f6 3.Qh5 mate reaches the same position.

Can Black checkmate in three moves?

Black can mate in two with Fool's mate, so three is not a barrier at all on that side. The reason the numbers differ is simply that White moves first: after two moves each, Black has had two moves to White's two, while after White's second move Black has only had one.

Is the three-move mate worth playing for?

No. It needs your opponent to push both kingside pawns in the first two moves, which nobody does after their first week. Playing 2.Qh5 hoping for it just develops your queen where it can be chased, and you lose the time you should be spending on pieces.

Go deeper

Practise these mates on real positions. The app serves thousands, matched to your rating.

← All: Basic checkmates · Learn chess