Basic checkmates

Why two knights cannot force checkmate

Updated · Sergei Tovmasian

Short answer

The mating position exists, so a defender can walk into it, but nothing makes him. To mate you have to cover the corner squares with both knights, and the moment the second knight arrives without giving check the position is stalemate. Only an enemy pawn, which gives the defender a move to make, changes that.

Two knights can absolutely give mate. Here is one, and it is a perfectly ordinary looking position.

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h 1
Knights on d6 and f6, white king g6, black king h8. 1.Nf7 is mate: the f6 knight covers g8 and h7, the king covers g7.

So why does every endgame book call this a draw? Because Black had to be standing on h8 for that to work, and no sequence of White moves can make him go there.

The square you need is the square that draws

Now take the d6 knight off the board and look at what is left. This is exactly what you get while the second knight is still trekking across the board, because the king and the first knight are what does the pushing.

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h 1
Black to move and it is stalemate: h8 is not attacked, and g7, g8 and h7 are all covered. The second knight was still on its way.

That is the whole tragedy of the ending in one picture. The knight on f6 and the king on g6 have done their job too well: the black king has no square, and no check. Draw.

To turn it into mate you need the second knight to arrive on f7 with check, and it takes several moves to get there. During those moves the black king must be allowed a square to stand on, and if you give him a square he uses it: he steps to g8, then f8, and he is out of the corner. Cover the flight, and it is the position above. Leave the flight open, and he runs. There is no third option, which is why the ending is drawn against any defender who simply refuses to sit in the corner.

The exception with a pawn on the board

Give the defender a pawn and the logic breaks. Now he always has a legal move to make, so the stalemate escape disappears, and if that pawn is far enough back for you to blockade it with a knight, the mate can genuinely be forced. The set of squares where this works is called the Troitsky line, and the resulting positions can take more than fifty moves to win, which makes them a curiosity rather than something to study.

For practical purposes the rule is simple. If you have two knights against a bare king, offer a draw and get on with your day. If you have two knights against a king and a blocked pawn, do not capture the pawn.

None of this stops a knight from being a lethal mating piece with help. A knight is the only piece that can mate a king surrounded by its own army, which is what a smothered mate is, and it pairs with a bishop into a mate that can be forced, just about.

More questions

Is king and two knights against king a draw by insufficient material?

No, and this catches people out. Mate is possible if the defender cooperates, so the position is not dead and the arbiter will not stop the game. It is drawn by the fifty-move rule instead, once the attacker has failed to make progress. It also means you can lose on time against two knights, because a legal series of moves ending in mate exists.

Can two knights mate if the other side still has a pawn?

Sometimes, and it is one of the strangest results in endgame theory. If the enemy pawn is blocked far enough back, the defender always has a pawn move available, so there is no stalemate to fall back on and the mate can be forced. The squares where this works are known as the Troitsky line, after the study composer Alexey Troitsky.

Go deeper

Practise these mates on real positions. The app serves thousands, matched to your rating.

← All: Basic checkmates · Learn chess